<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Seven ways to massive arms</title>
		<description></description>
		<link>/articles</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:56:44 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc86</link>
			<description>Good article man... but nobody has arms bigger than 17 inches. Its impossible!!!</description>
			<author>Trey</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:57:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc87</link>
			<description>Don't be ridiculous, there's plenty of ppl with arms bigger than 17 inches, look at scott steiner (former WWE wrestler)...i think his were over 23 inches</description>
			<author>John</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:37:04 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc88</link>
			<description>John, of course there are lots of people with bigger arms than 17in but were referring to guys who are pure natural and we are genrallising. Alot of pro's including the WWE's are on the Gear or HGH! Generally I'd have to agree with the article. Mine are 17.5 and I'm natural so are most of my natural friends. Hell, even some of my chemical using budds aint much bigger!</description>
			<author>Marc</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:12:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc89</link>
			<description>Look at Greg Valentino on google, maybe you will change your mind!!</description>
			<author>Akhan</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:57:10 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc90</link>
			<description>I'm thoroughly depressed now. Just measured mine and they come in at a pathetic 15.5 Is life worth living now?</description>
			<author>Colin</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:56:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc91</link>
			<description>youve got to remember fellas that when you measure your arms you have to flex them. I have a mate who hasnt used any gear just 23 years hard graft and his are 19 inches</description>
			<author>jay</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:18:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc92</link>
			<description>do you tense your arms while measuring or not??</description>
			<author>sean</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:03:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc246</link>
			<description>oh how happy am i?, i have 17.5 inch arms and wanted bigger...reading this prehaps they are ok after all..still would love them to be 20 inches though..what does it take?</description>
			<author>dave</author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 11:40:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc248</link>
			<description>Measure your arms when they are pumped</description>
			<author>admin</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 10:13:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc511</link>
			<description>Great article. I firmly believe that one of the most common mistakes that i see in a gym is young guys doing way too many curls. I train bi's &amp;amp; tri's once a week, max 5 sets for each. They also have to work hard on my other training day (back,chest,delts). I can remember being disappointed at losing half an inch off my bicpes.What i didn't realise was this was because i had also lost a good 2 inches off my waist. Smaller,leaner arms look far better than larger fat ones! I also think height &amp;amp; bone structure plus ofcourse genetics are major factors.</description>
			<author>steve</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:48:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc547</link>
			<description>Some confusion about recovery: Arnie said biceps recover the quickest &amp;amp; would train them 3 times a week using very high volume work. Dorian Yates (in his book) would spend about 10 minutes a week training them (sometimes even doing them fortnightly instead of weekly) emphasing the rest period. Both had/have great biceps. Who's right??</description>
			<author>steve</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:30:21 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc550</link>
			<description>you cant go by ARNIE you would not have that much money for the gear.three times a week you kidding me.</description>
			<author>TOPPERMAN</author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:43:55 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://www.musclebulletin.com/articles/index.php/training-articles-mn/arms-mn/238?task=view#josc553</link>
			<description>No i'm not kidding u, that's what he says.Calves were done 6 days a week, 20+ sets a time! I'm sure the big guys doing low volume are on gear too. Personally i train arm once a week,low vol.</description>
			<author>steve</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:41:10 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
